![]() (Note: That sentence doesn't imply event-driven programming is impossible in C/++. You need to press the click here area as fast as you can and the program will count the number of mouse clicks automatically. I can't imagine what gave you the idea that C++ supports event-driven programming. "This is the steering wheel, this is the gas pedal, and to save time we'll skip the brakes. Being prepared to accept the answer is a requirement when asking a question.ģ. Dylan Allred from Las Vegas, Nevada, United States is the one who clicked his mouse a total of 1,051 times in 10 seconds. Related to the previous point, an answer isn't falsified by you not agreeing with it. You won't be ready for at least six months, or until you can finish a basic C++ (or C, but simulation can benefit from OOP) tutorial, whichever comes last.Īnd this is my advice, in order of decreasing importance:Ģ. You're not ready to write a physics engine, or anything even remotely as complex. The tap counter records the number of clicks automatically in. Click on plus to increment the counter or minus to decrement it: the value adjusts automatically. MOUSE CLICKER COUNT MANUALUnlike an automatic counter, this one is manual and you set the value yourself. So, in summary, this is what I gather from everything you've posted:ġ. The click counter is a free online tool that you can use to count up and down or to calculate a number. We have performed tests such as clicks per second, where you can test your mouse clicking speed. An "older" programmer would know this already, probably by experience. Spacebar Test Spacebar Counter Spacebar Clicker. MOUSE CLICKER COUNT CODEI would never have even considered that this code was written by someone with more than a year of programming. Click Counter is a timeless framework to count the number of clicks without any time limit. This is also the code of someone who (although I hate to repeat myself) is trying to run before they can walk, and that's something you just can't do in programming. ![]() And the truth is, when I look at the code you posted, I see code written by someone who, while they seem to understand the basics of procedural programming, is making the fatal mistake of assuming a language has features that haven't been mentioned, and in fact doesn't have. However, anything other than the truth wouldn't have really helped you. ![]() I estimate you'll have a fully working physics engine in a week" and it wouldn't have made a difference to me. I could have said "yeah, it looks great and your grasp of the logic of C++ is accurate. On my side, lying and telling the truth are exactly the same. ![]() Look, guy, if you ask questions, you have to be ready for the answers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |